Transparency Statement: Human-AI Collaboration in QIF Framework

This document is auto-generated from the QIF Derivation Log, which is the single source of truth for all framework decisions and AI collaboration records.

Last generated: 2026-06-20 at 00:10:07

Table of Contents

• AI Collaboration Summary
• AI Contribution Breakdown
• Core Principle
• Tools Used
• Documented Corrections

---

AI Collaboration Summary

Metric	Value
Total derivation entries	111
Entries involving AI	77 (69%)
Corrections / retractions	🔴 5
Quorum swarm reviews	🟢 5
Human-only entries	0
Human decision rate	🟢 100% (Kevin Qi is Accountable on every entry)

AI Contribution Breakdown

Level	Count	Description
AI-assisted	0	Human directed; AI implemented or researched
AI-generated	0	AI produced first draft; human reviewed and approved
Human-only	0	No AI involvement
Quorum-reviewed	0	Multi-agent swarm validation
Unspecified	111	Legacy entries without AI Contribution Level metadata

Core Principle

Every contribution is categorized by its cognitive origin. AI assistance is treated as a tool subject to human oversight, not a collaborator with independent judgment on ethical or novel technical matters. All final decisions are made by Kevin Qi (A = Accountable in every RACI entry).

Tools Used

Tool	Role
Claude Opus 4.6	Primary AI assistant — co-derivation, implementation, literature synthesis
Quorum (Claude plugin)	Multi-agent swarm review — structured dissent, fact-checking, security audit

Documented Corrections

The derivation log contains explicit correction entries (Classification: CORRECTION) where previous claims were retracted or revised. This is by design — corrections are the most valuable entries because they demonstrate active oversight.

Total corrections: 5

---

Generated from 111 derivation log entries. Source: QIF-DERIVATION-LOG.md

Generated by Quorum governance pipeline