Skip to content

QIF-T0104

high

Neural spoofing

Tier 5 — Theoretical (Modeled / Simulated)

Legacy status: THEORETICAL

Forge neural identity to impersonate a legitimate BCI node or user. Analogous to IP/ARP spoofing. From Murcia neural cyberattack taxonomy (8 attacks: flooding, jamming, scanning, selective forwarding, spoofing, sybil, sinkhole, nonce). QIF-T0025-T0028 cover 4; this and T0105-T0107 cover the remaining 4.

Technique Details

Tactic
QIF-N.IJ
Status
THEORETICAL
Bands
I0, N1

Therapeutic Application

Forging neural identity signatures to impersonate a legitimate BCI node or user, analogous to IP/ARP spoofing in network security

Neural Impact

2 of 7 neural bands affected

I0 N1

Drag to rotate. Click a region to learn more.

Click or hover over a glowing region to see the attack techniques targeting it and their severity.

Scoring

NISS v1.1 NISS:1.1/BI:L/CR:H/CD:H/CV:E/RV:P/NP:N
4.7Medium
BICRCDCVRVNP
 

Governance

Neurorights at Risk

This technique threatens 3 of the 4 proposed neurorights (Ienca & Andorno, 2017).

Consent Complexity
0.36 / 4.0

FDORA §3305 Compliance

Non-Cyber Device (missing: software, network)
Regulatory Coverage
0.1 / 1.0
524B Requirements
TM VA SA PM
Regulatory Gaps
  • ! CVSS cannot express neural-specific impacts
  • ! Threat not yet in regulatory threat catalogs

Population Vulnerability

CRB vulnerability adjustment (γ=0.30) accounts for age, diagnosis severity, consent capacity, and device dependency.

Population NISS Base Adjusted Severity Delta
Adult (Default) 4.7 4.7 Medium -
Child (10yr) + ADHD 4.7 5.5 Medium +0.83
Adult with ALS 4.7 5.5 Medium +0.76

Validation Status

Theoretical / Not yet validated. This technique has not been independently tested. See the validation dashboard for what has been tested.

Qinnovate Neural Security Atlas Edit this on GitHub