Skip to content

QIF-T0030

critical

Motor hijacking

Tier 5 — Theoretical (Modeled / Simulated)

Legacy status: THEORETICAL

Force involuntary motor actions by injecting false motor commands through compromised BCI motor interfaces. Intent verification compares commands against detected cognitive intent. Physical safety interlocks required.

Technique Details

Tactic
QIF-N.MD
Status
THEORETICAL
Bands
I0, N5, N6, N7

✚ Therapeutic Application

Hijacking motor cortex output signals to produce involuntary movement via BCI motor interface

Clinical Analog

Functional electrical stimulation (FES) / brain-controlled prosthetics

Treats

  • spinal cord injury
  • stroke rehabilitation
  • paralysis
  • limb prosthetics

Neural Impact

4 of 7 neural bands affected

I0 N5 N6 N7

Drag to rotate. Click a region to learn more.

Click or hover over a glowing region to see the attack techniques targeting it and their severity.

DSM-5-TR Diagnostic Mappings

Diagnostic category references for threat modeling, not diagnostic claims.

F43.2 Adjustment Disorder F90 ADHD F10 Alcohol-related disorders (F10) F42 OCD F95 Tic Disorders F32 Major Depressive Disorder F41.1 Generalized Anxiety Disorder F43.10 PTSD F44 Dissociative Disorders F20 Schizophrenia Spectrum F50 Eating Disorders F30 Manic episode F60 Personality Disorders F45 Somatoform disorders F63 Impulse-Control Disorders F01 Vascular dementia F43 PTSD / Trauma F80 Communication Disorders F98.4 Stereotyped movement disorders

Pathway: N7 (PFC/M1) → executive function; N6 (hippocampus/amygdala) → emotion regulation

Following Poldrack (2006), brain region disruption does not uniquely predict psychiatric outcomes.

Scoring

NISS v1.1 NISS:1.1/BI:H/CR:C/CD:C/CV:E/RV:P/NP:T
CVSS v4.0 CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H
6.7Medium
PINSPINS triggers when Biological Impact is High/Critical or Reversibility is Irreversible. Indicates potential lasting harm to neural safety.
BICRCDCVRVNP
 

Governance

Neurorights at Risk

This technique threatens 5 of the 4 proposed neurorights (Ienca & Andorno, 2017).

MP Mental Privacy CL Cognitive Liberty MI Mental Integrity PC Psychological Continuity DI DI
Consent Complexity
1.50 / 4.0

FDORA §3305 Compliance

Non-Cyber Device (missing: network)
Regulatory Coverage
0.5 / 1.0
524B Requirements
TM VA SBOM SA PM
Regulatory Gaps
  • ! CVSS cannot express neural-specific impacts
  • ! Threat not yet in regulatory threat catalogs

Population Vulnerability

CRB vulnerability adjustment (γ=0.30) accounts for age, diagnosis severity, consent capacity, and device dependency.

Population NISS Base Adjusted Severity Delta
Adult (Default) 6.7 6.7 Medium -
Child (10yr) + ADHD 6.7 7.9 High ▲ +1.18
Adult with ALS 6.7 7.8 High ▲ +1.08

Validation Status

Theoretical / Not yet validated. This technique has not been independently tested. See the validation dashboard for what has been tested.

Qinnovate Neural Security Atlas Edit this on GitHub