QIF-T0008
highCommand hijacking
Tier 5 — Theoretical (Modeled / Simulated)
Legacy status: THEORETICAL
Intercept and modify motor commands or cognitive instructions in transit through the BCI system. Targets closed-loop stimulation devices. Intent verification detects command-intent mismatch.
Technique Details
- Tactic
- QIF-N.IJ
- Status
- THEORETICAL
- Bands
- S2, N7, N6, N5
✚ Therapeutic Application
Interception and substitution of BCI motor/sensory command signals
Clinical Analog
BCI command interfaces for motor-impaired patients
Treats
- ALS
- locked-in syndrome
- tetraplegia
- stroke (motor rehabilitation)
Neural Impact
4 of 7 neural bands affected
Drag to rotate. Click a region to learn more.
Click or hover over a glowing region to see the attack techniques targeting it and their severity.
DSM-5-TR Diagnostic Mappings
Diagnostic category references for threat modeling, not diagnostic claims.
Pathway: N7 (PFC/M1) → executive function; N6 (hippocampus/amygdala) → emotion regulation
Following Poldrack (2006), brain region disruption does not uniquely predict psychiatric outcomes.
Scoring
NISS:1.1/BI:H/CR:H/CD:H/CV:E/RV:P/NP:T CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H Governance
Neurorights at Risk
This technique threatens 5 of the 4 proposed neurorights (Ienca & Andorno, 2017).
FDORA §3305 Compliance
- ! CVSS cannot express neural-specific impacts
- ! Consent complexity under-matches neural impact (CCI/NISS mismatch)
- ! Threat not yet in regulatory threat catalogs
Population Vulnerability
CRB vulnerability adjustment (γ=0.30) accounts for age, diagnosis severity, consent capacity, and device dependency.
| Population | NISS Base | Adjusted | Severity | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adult (Default) | 6.1 | 6.1 | Medium | - |
| Child (10yr) + ADHD | 6.1 | 7.2 | High ▲ | +1.08 |
| Adult with ALS | 6.1 | 7.1 | High ▲ | +0.98 |
Validation Status
Theoretical / Not yet validated. This technique has not been independently tested. See the validation dashboard for what has been tested.